a écrit le 24 avril 2004 à 14h23 Ah les Kmer! Que voulez nous montré,Seeping Blighter? I am scandalised and stopped-in-the-tracks by the hullabaloo and polemics that FIFA is engendering over Cameroon's CAN outfit. I honestly don't see what's wrong with it and I think FIFA'S decision is heavy-handed,arbitray and illegal. The outfit if anything, is innovative and brings elegance to a stiff-jacketed and typical macho sport. Nous gars se presentaient plus sexi, non?
The outfit does not, as it is the case with other sports such as athletics and gymnastics, reveal any offensive anatomy of the wearer. N'avez vous pas vus les njunjus des gymnastes Russe? Seeping Blighter should take another look at female gymnastes to get my point.
FIFA hasn't adduced a single evidence that unequivocally proves the outfit's offensive character. What are we talking about standards and who sets them? What with the often tooted new approach of Peoples' participation and Good Governance? Estce le Cameroun avec ses lois arbitraire..s'il vous plait, prefetorials? Doesn't conventional wisdom argue that good standards and laws should emmanate from usage and the actual actors themselves?I wonder what would have been Blatter's reaction if the outfit had been worn by say, France or the U.S! Blatter est racist.
C.A.F had approved the Cameroonian outfit and C.A.F is either an autonomous and independent body an agent of F.I.F.A. In either case, her decisions and agreements are binding to all and must be accepted by F.I.F.A. How then could F.I.F.A turn around and refute a decision of its agent or an automous and independent body?
Blatter is already in the headlines and needless for him acting like a Panjandrum by curting cheap publicity and trying to have his hands into every pie. For us Football lovers, it's our collective shame that we are not moving with the times. Ask basketball lovers about the sleeveless outfits of basketball players!!!
Le mieux c'est pour Popol de partir sinon, on le chasseras dans très bientôt! I swear I no fit lie you.
The outfit does not, as it is the case with other sports such as athletics and gymnastics, reveal any offensive anatomy of the wearer. N'avez vous pas vus les njunjus des gymnastes Russe? Seeping Blighter should take another look at female gymnastes to get my point.
FIFA hasn't adduced a single evidence that unequivocally proves the outfit's offensive character. What are we talking about standards and who sets them? What with the often tooted new approach of Peoples' participation and Good Governance? Estce le Cameroun avec ses lois arbitraire..s'il vous plait, prefetorials? Doesn't conventional wisdom argue that good standards and laws should emmanate from usage and the actual actors themselves?I wonder what would have been Blatter's reaction if the outfit had been worn by say, France or the U.S! Blatter est racist.
C.A.F had approved the Cameroonian outfit and C.A.F is either an autonomous and independent body an agent of F.I.F.A. In either case, her decisions and agreements are binding to all and must be accepted by F.I.F.A. How then could F.I.F.A turn around and refute a decision of its agent or an automous and independent body?
Blatter is already in the headlines and needless for him acting like a Panjandrum by curting cheap publicity and trying to have his hands into every pie. For us Football lovers, it's our collective shame that we are not moving with the times. Ask basketball lovers about the sleeveless outfits of basketball players!!!
Le mieux c'est pour Popol de partir sinon, on le chasseras dans très bientôt! I swear I no fit lie you.
